Robert Durst, who famously was acquitted
of murder in Galveston in 2003, has reportedly had his case looked into by
federal authorities for jury tampering. (full coverage; Houston Chronicle) They can’t retry him for the murder.
There is no civil rights edge to the case.
Durst was the scion of a prominent and insanely wealthy rich New York
family, who was accused of killing his wife, and was found years later in
Galveston, Texas living as a woman, after he had shot his neighbor, chopped up
his body and disposed of it in Galveston bay.
Two of the three bags (containing the torso and limbs, separately)
washed ashore. The head never did.
Durst spent almost three years in jail
awaiting and during trial and was eventually convicted of obstruction of
justice for chopping up the neighbor’s body and dumping it in the bay. He was, however, acquitted of murder with the
assistance of Dick DeGuerin and Chip Lewis, two brilliant criminal
lawyers. They argued that without the head,
there was nothing to challenge Durst’s story that the neighbor, who was known
to be crazy, had started a fight and Durst had shot him in self-defense. Without the head, there was no evidence of
whether the neighbor was shot in the front of the head or back, close range or
far. In other words, there was no evidence. DeGuerin and Lewis’ strategy was to find, and
select jurors with the capacity and willingness to use abstract thought (by
deselecting or striking those who didn’t during voir dire) and who could separate the accusations of murder from
those of obstruction of justice; separating the question of murder vs.
self-defense, from the disposal of the body. It worked.
Perhaps this case informed last week’s story out of Florida of the guy who famously said “Things just got
a little out of hand” after decapitating his roommate. Perhaps the guy from Greenacres had heard
about Durst, killed his roommate, then thought, if I can chop up the body and
no one finds the important parts, I will have a better defense. Scott Tobiassen got caught with all the body
parts. Durst didn’t.
Now the feds are reportedly
investigating jury tampering. No other information
has come out. They can’t let this
sleeping dog lie. Durst’s verdict was
too much of a lesson to criminals on how to build a defense. High level prosecutors can’t let that dog
lie.
No comments:
Post a Comment